DSII or Sacred: Underworld?

[Hacknshoot]

Note: this is from my side of the world, as some countries have already released the game.

If you want to, will you buy Dungeon Siege II, Sacred: Underworld, both, or neither?

I love both games, so I vote both!

[ldonyo]

I like Sacred much more than Dungeon Siege, so I will get Underworld.

[Hacknshoot]

I'm finishing the Lands of Hyperborea siegelet while I look over these posts, but I am waiting for S:U as well. :D
*uses Hammer of Thunder, Shock spell, and Flame spell(I'm an evil flamer lol) to beat enemies and level my skills up*

[txa1265]

My understanding:
- Sacred Underworld is just more of Sacred.
- Dungeon Siege II is very much a retooled game, with loads of new stuff.

While I also liked Sacred more than Dungeon Siege, I don't see mysef getting underworld, and I have to know more about Dungeon Siege II before committing to *that* either.

Mike

[Hacknshoot]

There should be a beta test version of it out for the public. I don't know if it's over or whatever, but it should be at Fileplanet.

[Runeblade]

Dungeon Siege II because I'm a Single Player RPG'r

[ldonyo]

Sacred is basically a single-player game with multiplayer capability, much like Dungeon Lords purports to be (and might end up being once all the patches are out). ;)

[Hacknshoot]

Yeah, Sacred really got better with the 1.8.26 patch(something like that) since I kept getting desconnected on the 1.6 one. And the addition of the new sets rocked. DS was disappointing on Multiplayer playing, but I don't play MP there unless it's by myself anyway. ;)

[Visigoth]

Sacred Underworld is a cool game, if a bit repetative. The main thing about DS 2 that is intriguing is that "hopefully" the devs will have listend to the community and made the game a lot less of a "hands off" gaming experience. DS 1 was cool, but combat was mind numbingly boring. I couldn't even keep my 10 year old interested in it.