PDA

View Full Version : He11 Wars: New Screens at Xboxfront!



Machetazo
07-01-2005, 02:12 PM
Ten new screens have been posted within the last couple of days at that site. Give them a look by following this link (http://www.xboxfront.de/screenshots-753-1065.html) :)

GOREGRINDER
07-01-2005, 03:42 PM
omg i soooo take for granted how i see that game all the time,...xbox doom3 made a better conversion visually and that was ugly as sin too


'thumbs down

BloodBuster
07-01-2005, 03:46 PM
Crikey! I think the shots look pretty cool. I like the curlicues on the Rocket Launcher and the Skulls look slightly different too.

Thanks for the link!

ougabooga
07-04-2005, 11:27 AM
all i gotta say is that PC games converted for console usually attract those console gamers to try the pc version.

BloodBuster
07-04-2005, 12:52 PM
My son plays a PS2 version of a Star Wars game he bought me for my PC. The PS2 version looks crap, and the 'playability' is nothing like the PC version.

Luigibuddy
07-04-2005, 01:54 PM
All I see so far is the same game but with bad graphics, joy.

[U2F]_TG
07-04-2005, 06:11 PM
All I see so far is the same game but with bad graphics, joy.

very,very bad graphics

OMG this is like two steps back.. and an. extra step backwards ..

It must be horrible for the PCF folks to have to work on this..

SpeedrazoR
07-04-2005, 06:15 PM
yeah doesnt look too good at all :\
stay with a good PC :) much better

Grinder1989
07-04-2005, 07:24 PM
The graphics suck.

Grinder

maspingon
07-04-2005, 08:08 PM
OMG,XBill sux:/

EdSquareCat
07-05-2005, 04:10 PM
May I ask why the health is constantly 400+?

Beelzebomb
07-07-2005, 02:56 PM
Aw man. Poor Xboxers.

sTaTIx
07-08-2005, 10:02 AM
Why the heck is everyone dissing PCF's work? Man, you guys are harsh. At least play the game, or see it in motion first before you disrespect their game. Continually throwing sludge at their game and mocking it isn't very respectful to the developers.

GOREGRINDER
08-01-2005, 09:51 PM
i do see th egame in motion and i have played it more than you know,...its called the real version on the pc not the dummied down cut rate graphics,resolution and lighting(and im sure the animation is no different) on the xbox,...its not dissing the developers because wtf else can they do with such limitations of memory?

Big Roachy
08-01-2005, 11:08 PM
I'm surprised they're still releasing the Xbox version, after basically killing the community by not releasing mod tools. I didn't think anyone cared enough anymore to want an Xbox version.

PainKilla
08-01-2005, 11:11 PM
I agree with sTaTIx.

Why are you saying the graphics suck? So what, the textures may be larger than in the PC version, but remember... This is for the original Xbox, not the "oh special" Xbox360.

It would run terribly if it looked the exact same as the PC version, as far as I can say about all xbox games. So tell me, would you rather have the graphics look good, and have slow gameplay? Or would you rather have it fair looks, and fast gameplay?


I'm surprised they're still releasing the Xbox version, after basically killing the community by not releasing mod tools. I didn't think anyone cared enough anymore to want an Xbox version.

People who are Xbox only may have wanted to try out the game, they didn't make an xbox version for us of the forum community.

Big Roachy
08-02-2005, 10:20 AM
What I'm saying is, I'm surprised that enough people remember the game for them to release a version on Xbox.

GOREGRINDER
08-02-2005, 12:13 PM
can you really appreciate the stake gun with an analog stick?

no so the xbox people arent goin to see it the way they would having even played it on a sh!t pc rather than the xbox

Boksha
08-02-2005, 01:59 PM
Heh, I suppose this is the kind of reaction you'd expect from a forum that has only people that have been playing this game on the PC. :)

ougabooga
08-02-2005, 06:21 PM
BAH,if the Xbill v1.? was so BAAAHHHHDDDD! they'd not release it on xbox.!!!
REASON #
1.I think the xbox guys deserve it more then the PS2 guys since ps2'rs aren't fps manaic's
2.If i didn't experience doom & quake 2 on PSX i'd have NEVER become a PC gamer.
3.Without getting more ppl liking PK ur sure to NOT expand it into v2 !!!,that includes consoles & MORE then likely i'll substitute a NEW PC purchase with a MUCH CHEAPER xbox360 till dual core/ddr3 PC's are "AFFORDABLE" ! ! !

P.S. >> NOT to mention i also want a dual core vid card which i BELIEVE will OUTPERFORM this SLI/crossfire BS of a gamers wallet:p .......nVidia & ati need a good BEAT DOWN for such mockary (twice the price for 50% performance??? WHAT A SMACK in the SUUCCKKEERRSS FACE.........OH,u GOT BRAGGING RIGHTS alright,the right to be a CHUMP!!!)

frosty6665
08-03-2005, 12:31 AM
I dont want to sound like an asshole, but the game looks like crap

PainKilla
08-03-2005, 10:36 AM
I dont want to sound like an asshole, but the game looks like crap

Mkay...
I suppose you'll go and play quake 1, and you'll probably say the game looks good.

For everyone, again kind of reposting...
They're not making it just for us, so that we can play it on the x-box, they're making it for everyone, so they all can get a fair experience of what the game was. There are people out in the world who are console only gamers, and use computers only for their own uses, internet for example.

Anyway, I'd like to see any of you actualy try to convert a game like Painkiller over to the xbox. Give PCF some slack.

GOREGRINDER
08-12-2005, 03:24 PM
MORE then likely i'll substitute a NEW PC purchase with a MUCH CHEAPER xbox360 till dual core/ddr3 PC's are "AFFORDABLE" ! ! !

P.S. >> NOT to mention i also want a dual core vid card which i BELIEVE will OUTPERFORM this SLI/crossfire BS of a gamers wallet:p .......nVidia & ati need a good BEAT DOWN for such mockary (twice the price for 50% performance??? WHAT A SMACK in the SUUCCKKEERRSS FACE.........OH,u GOT BRAGGING RIGHTS alright,the right to be a CHUMP!!!)

thats a good example of talking out yer bum(and no im not a brit,..heh)

for these reasons..
1:ATI and nVidia are making the graphics chips for the next gen consoles,....so who owns who?ATI=xbox360(a.k.a. r520/nVidia=ps3(a.k.a. 7800gpu(G70)/rsx)
2:with consoles you get what you get and thats it,your game will get no better,no faster,if it comes with slowdown and jerked frames,..too bad sucker,..... thats it,no turning anything down or tweakin squat!... its as good as it gets for a minimum of 50 bux(which are being talked about as console games become 69.99 per new release,hows that for your slap in the face?)a pc game will get better with hardware upgrades well,..depending what you start with hardware wise and what your tweaking and optimizing skills are that is
3:fps games are half of what they are on the pc,...i play consoles with my girlfriend cuz she can handle that
4: load times,...you think they are not gonna be there on the new consoles,..wrong they will in full bore,.....i promise you i dont even have enough time to take a drink of mt dew before im loaded up and already in game before i set it down
5:consoles are not allowed update patch fixes! via internet only additional content!,...how lame,will there be people mass outletting engines and full conversion mods for your latest games?,..no.,..not likely,..and what are ps3 and xbox 360 games gonna be made on,...oh thats right,...a pc with far supierior and capable hardware;),....so to get a console to replace your pc?,.....good luck and have fun :D

case in point ,..these new consoles are just being brought up to speed to where high end pc's have been on the edge of technology the whole time,.....dont like sli?,..ok well i have the gpu core the rsx ps3 gpu is derived from,...sli would make 2 of those in the same system,..so imagine taking the power of 2 ps3's graphics and playing your games with that kind power(if you seen the ps3 graphics tech talk and demo youll see that both the 7800gtx and the ps3 gpu are both the equivilent of 2x6800ultras in sli,...and i can honestly say,..sometimes faster) and of course being able to turn more graphics options up that arent even included in the console version at a whopping 640x720p @ best while im sporting a 1600x1200 with maxed supersampling anti aliasing and 16x AF

my advice,..dont cop out of a pc in turn for a console,...otherwise you just may get to play F.E.A.R. sometime next year if your lucky,..lol(btw dual core doesnt translate to faster gaming just so you know)

sTaTIx
08-12-2005, 08:54 PM
thats a good example of talking out yer bum(and no im not a brit,..heh)

for these reasons..
1:ATI and nVidia are making the graphics chips for the next gen consoles,....so who owns who?ATI=xbox360(a.k.a. r520/nVidia=ps3(a.k.a. 7800gpu(G70)/rsx)
2:with consoles you get what you get and thats it,your game will get no better,no faster,if it comes with slowdown and jerked frames,..too bad sucker,..... thats it,no turning anything down or tweakin squat!... its as good as it gets for a minimum of 50 bux(which are being talked about as console games become 69.99 per new release,hows that for your slap in the face?)a pc game will get better with hardware upgrades well,..depending what you start with hardware wise and what your tweaking and optimizing skills are that is
3:fps games are half of what they are on the pc,...i play consoles with my girlfriend cuz she can handle that
4: load times,...you think they are not gonna be there on the new consoles,..wrong they will in full bore,.....i promise you i dont even have enough time to take a drink of mt dew before im loaded up and already in game before i set it down
5:consoles are not allowed update patch fixes! via internet only additional content!,...how lame,will there be people mass outletting engines and full conversion mods for your latest games?,..no.,..not likely,..and what are ps3 and xbox 360 games gonna be made on,...oh thats right,...a pc with far supierior and capable hardware;),....so to get a console to replace your pc?,.....good luck and have fun :D

case in point ,..these new consoles are just being brought up to speed to where high end pc's have been on the edge of technology the whole time,.....dont like sli?,..ok well i have the gpu core the rsx ps3 gpu is derived from,...sli would make 2 of those in the same system,..so imagine taking the power of 2 ps3's graphics and playing your games with that kind power(if you seen the ps3 graphics tech talk and demo youll see that both the 7800gtx and the ps3 gpu are both the equivilent of 2x6800ultras in sli,...and i can honestly say,..sometimes faster) and of course being able to turn more graphics options up that arent even included in the console version at a whopping 640x720p @ best while im sporting a 1600x1200 with maxed supersampling anti aliasing and 16x AF

my advice,..dont cop out of a pc in turn for a console,...otherwise you just may get to play F.E.A.R. sometime next year if your lucky,..lol(btw dual core doesnt translate to faster gaming just so you know)
Meh, whatever dude. Consoles have ALWAYS own PCs and always will. Consoles are by far more popular and sell better and will be even more popular next generation. Consoles also have a LOT more quality games releasing every month. Consoles are also a lot more comfortable and fun to play on a big screen HDTV and with a controller on the couch. The next-gen consoles will own the PCs even more badly than this generation, and PCs are continuing to slowly wither away in popularity and sales and more and more devs are converting to consoles. Plus with the power of the next-gen consoles, we will be able to play games in 1920x1080p (NOT 640x720p, you are completely wrong) resolution and with better graphics than any PC game for a long time. Also you say that consoles games stay the same forever because the hardware doesn't change, but that's clearly BS. Have you seen the difference between Halo 2 and Halo 1? There's a huge difference, yet the hardware didn't change, how do you explain that? Admit it, PC gaming is DYING and consoles are becoming bigger and bigger every day and will soon consume PC gaming whole! ;)

GOREGRINDER
08-13-2005, 06:28 PM
there is no such thing as 1080p,...its 1080i ,..interlaced not progressive,..prgressive is the higher quality HD(720p is the highest form of high definition quality,..1080i is just the bigger number,..lol,right there is where your credibility on this subject is lost) interlaced can be converted from standard broadcast television,and ive had hd widescreen for about a year now and i install home theaters/build,tweak custom pcs for a living so im quite in tune thank you:D,..and i have a ps2 and an xbox both running in dolby digitalEX 7.1 on a 34" sony wega hd widescreen and guess what,its not as fun as my pc,you can simply just do more,..and thats not sometin that can be argued


consoles are toys,....sorry but its true,they are,what have we been playin painkiller on for over a year and a half? a pc,...and when is it hittin the consoles,....about 2 years after its pc,...same with every inportant ground breaking new technology next gen game or development,..half life2 game of teh year on many accounts, pc first,..doom3 next gen real time lighting and shadow technology,..and then butchered on the console like all the rest,........and the consoles always start out great hardware wise but 6 months in they are massly inferrior to pc's. yeah consoles get flooded with hundreds more games,...the sh!ttiest games ever made!!!,....with good ones in between that add up to the amount of good pc games in the first place,...that arent ran through in a night and then tossed away the next day just like the toy it is,..pc games last much longer,.are of higher quality,and are realeased on pc first if its of new technology,....the only people that say consoles own pc's are people that have pc's that their consoles are more power ful and play games better on,....and frankly,..thats what they are for
and btw who said you cant play your pc on a hd widescreen on the couch?

and you idiot what are they gonna make your little console toy games on if a pc dies?,..lol

j_diltz
08-13-2005, 06:56 PM
If they get it to run without framerate hiccups, they will have done their job. Comparing console to pc otherwise is apples and oranges.

GOREGRINDER
08-13-2005, 08:37 PM
i agree they are 2 seprate worlds entirely,i play consoles when i wanna play somethin with my gf(video games wise you perverts!,..lol,and she can handle just puttin in a disk and playin much easier),and my pc when i wanna take in a much higher experience and do a million other things

ougabooga
08-18-2005, 09:45 AM
CONSOLES are superior in their 1st 2yrs of life,after that the pc looks much better.

ALL i was stating is that i usually do small pc upgrade every yr & a new pc every 2nd yr SOOOOOOoooooooo a xbox 360 for 350$ in it's 1st 2 yrs of life is LOGICALLY a SUPERIOR IDEA then buy a FREAKING 1500$ PC.

You're SUCH a smart guy,GO DO THE MATH>> 1st 2 yrs of xbox vs a brand new PC,you're gonna need a new PC to play those console ported PC games.................PC LOSES HANDS DOWN.

Lastly, I PREFER PC's over consoles BUT i'am SICK & TIRED of this price gauging by ATI/nVidia/intel/creative...............etc