Great Game but only wanted singleplayer part

[anthony2259]

This game is pretty fun. But I only like RPG's that are singleplayer. If I wanted a multiplayer RPG game, I would play one of the dozens of MMORPG's out their. So instead of an excellent game, I got an unfinnished single player game. And a multiplayer portion that I will NEVER play. Im tired of hardley ever getting an excellent one player RPG experience nowadays. Because content is cut just to make the game multiplayer.

What would you rather compeat with. Single player RPG's, which are rare, or multiplayer RPG's that come out every month.

[NTJedi]

Originally Posted by anthony2259

This game is pretty fun. But I only like RPG's that are singleplayer. If I wanted a multiplayer RPG game, I would play one of the dozens of MMORPG's out their.

That's unusual... lots of people don't see it as financially wise to spend monthly fees on the MMORPG's game, but if you can afford an average of $240.oo a year plus paying a high speed connection that's your choice.

Originally Posted by anthony2259

So instead of an excellent game, I got an unfinnished single player game. And a multiplayer portion that I will NEVER play.

The publisher and developers stated long ago that this was going to be a multiplayer game... it even explains this on the box. Not their fault you can't read.

Originally Posted by anthony2259

Im tired of hardley ever getting an excellent one player RPG experience nowadays.

It's time to include family and friends in your gaming life... I guarantee this greatly increases the quality of a game.

Originally Posted by anthony2259

What would you rather compeat with. Single player RPG's, which are rare, or multiplayer RPG's that come out every month.

every month ??? I wish !
It's financially wise to develop a game which targets both singleplayer and multiplayer markets. This game definitely has bugs but patches are coming.

[GeorgeKeith]

Yes, I thoroughly am enjoying this game and I'm not the least bit fazed by ANYONE venting their dislikes.

[Berkut]

Anthony, RPG's and MMORPG's aren't on the same playing field. It's like comparing Counter Strike to PlanetSide, just because in both you get to shoot. Lets take it a step further, lets compare WorldOfWarcraft to Warcraft 2, because they have orcs in them and because of it lets take out multi-player option in Warcraft2/3 franchise to avoid competing with WoW.

[Draylock]

Are you serious kid? A million LAME RPG's come out every month. They are all copies of the good RPG's, chrono trigger, secret of mana, final fantasy, etc. No one plays these stupid RPG's because they aren't worth buying. but, COOPERATIVE RPG's are a thing that are scarce, even with them being scarce, half of them suck. Teamplay is much funner than singleplayer in my opinion. And theres still not many coop games out there.

[ragor]

Originally Posted by NTJedi

That's unusual... lots of people don't see it as financially wise to spend monthly fees on the MMORPG's game, but if you can afford an average of $240.oo a year plus paying a high speed connection that's your choice.

Originally Posted by NTJedi

every month ??? I wish !
It's financially wise to develop a game which targets both singleplayer and multiplayer markets. This game definitely has bugs but patches are coming.

You are probably the first person I've seen use the phrase "financially wise" in a post twice.

[Griever9977]

Originally Posted by anthony2259

This game is pretty fun. But I only like RPG's that are singleplayer. If I wanted a multiplayer RPG game, I would play one of the dozens of MMORPG's out their. So instead of an excellent game, I got an unfinnished single player game. And a multiplayer portion that I will NEVER play. Im tired of hardley ever getting an excellent one player RPG experience nowadays. Because content is cut just to make the game multiplayer.

What would you rather compeat with. Single player RPG's, which are rare, or multiplayer RPG's that come out every month.

If by rare single player RPG you mean 3rd person action RPG you are correct. They are rare. If by single player RPG, you mean single player RPG, you are wrong. I'm sorry.

Besides, multiplayer and MMO are different things, MMO isn't just multiplayer, that's what the first M is for. Massively. It's on a much larger scale. I personally like games like this with a multiplayer component, how many people complained that that was left out of Fable?

[zarconww]

I dont see where this would make a real good multi-player game.
The game is too restrictive in exporation and is too linear a story line
to get into different areas of the game world.